Facility Condition Assessment for Alberta Capital Planning

Turn observed asset condition across one or more facilities into prioritized actions and capital-planning inputs over an agreed planning horizon.

Request a Quote

PCA sample report excerpt (illustrative of reporting format)

Credentials verified: Commercial inspection and engineering credentials

CCPIA profile InterNACHI profile

What is a Facility Condition Assessment?

A Facility Condition Assessment (FCA) is a condition review of a facility's building systems and assets carried out to support facilities management and long-range capital planning. It documents the condition of assessed components, flags deficiencies and renewal needs, and produces cost and timing information that facilities and finance teams can feed into their own budgeting and asset-management processes. At Brookstone an FCA uses the same ASTM E2018-24 assessment methodology as a Property Condition Assessment; the systems covered, level of asset detail, and planning horizon are set by the scope agreed in writing before the engagement begins.

Key Takeaways

  • Built for facilities teams and institutional owners planning renewal spending
  • Assessment methodology follows ASTM E2018-24; components classified to UNIFORMAT II
  • Cost opinions and timing are structured so they can be carried into your own capital plan
  • FCA, BCA, and PCA overlap substantially — the agreed written scope governs the deliverable
  • The written proposal identifies the inspection and engineering roles included for the engagement

Decision guide

How facilities teams use an FCA

An FCA organizes observed condition into information that operations, leadership and finance teams can use for maintenance and capital decisions.

Facilities managers

Prioritize observed deficiencies, coordinate follow-up work and distinguish operational needs from planned renewal.

Institutional owners

Build a consistent condition baseline for schools, community, health, municipal or other owned facilities.

Non-profit organizations

Support board and funding discussions with a documented view of visible needs and planning assumptions.

Portfolio and finance teams

Compare priorities across facilities and organize planning-level costs within an agreed horizon.

Illustrative asset-register row

An asset-oriented record connects condition and action to a timing bucket that can inform a capital plan.

Illustrative format only; this is not client data, a quoted cost or a promised export format.

Asset / category

Air-handling unit / HVAC

Condition

Serviceable with age-related wear

Recommended action

Plan controls review and phased renewal

Priority

Medium

Planning-level cost

Allowance developed after equipment and scope review

Year / assumption

Within agreed 1–5-year bucket

From observed condition to a capital plan

Observed deficiencies are grouped by urgency and expected service need. Exact years, horizon and escalation assumptions are confirmed in the written proposal.

Immediate

Conditions requiring prompt attention, further specialist review or near-term risk management.

1–5 years

Repairs and renewals suitable for near-term capital coordination and budget development.

Longer term

Forecast renewals placed later in the agreed horizon, subject to monitoring and updated condition information.

Multi-facility scope and handoff

Each facility is scoped from its own size, age, systems, records and access needs so results can be compared without erasing site differences.

  • Facility list with addresses, approximate areas and primary uses
  • Available asset lists, drawings, prior reports and maintenance records
  • A nominated site contact and access plan for each facility
  • The required planning horizon and internal decision audience
  • Preferred report or tabular handoff format, confirmed as a deliverable in the proposal

Visual scope and limits

The assessment is visual and non-destructive unless the written proposal adds a specific specialist service. Asset-register detail and handoff format are agreed before work begins.

  • Concealed conditions, inaccessible assets and internal equipment condition are not confirmed
  • Environmental work, destructive testing, commissioning and code-compliance certification are not standard scope
  • A Facility Condition Index is not a standard deliverable and is considered only by written scope
  • CMMS integration or a specific software import is not included unless expressly confirmed in the proposal

Choosing FCA, PCA or BCA

Choose the assessment around the management decision and the information format your stakeholders need, then confirm the exact deliverable in writing.

AssessmentTypical decisionTypical reporting emphasis
FCAOperate and plan capital needs across one or more facilitiesAsset/category condition, actions, priorities, timing buckets and planning inputs
PCAEvaluate a property for purchase, financing or due diligenceProperty findings and probable costs aligned to the transaction scope
BCAUnderstand an individual building's condition and renewal needsBuilding-system findings, priorities and planning-level repair or renewal costs

The labels are not universal definitions. The written proposal controls facility count, systems, asset detail, planning horizon, output format, fee and schedule.

Pricing, schedule and quote scope

Fees and timing depend on facility count, locations, total area, uses, asset detail, available records, access, planning horizon and output requirements. The written proposal controls the final scope, deliverables, fee and timeline.

For a useful FCA quote, provide facility count and locations, approximate total area, available asset lists, desired planning horizon and preferred output format.

Request a scoped quote

Who Needs a Facility Condition Assessment?

  • Facilities and operations managers
  • Institutional owners — schools, health, municipal and public facilities
  • Non-profit and community organizations with aging buildings
  • Finance teams preparing multi-year capital budgets
  • Asset managers tracking renewal needs across a building
  • Boards approving deferred maintenance funding

Inspection Scope

  • Structural systems & foundation (visible)
  • Building envelope — roof, walls, windows, doors
  • Mechanical systems (HVAC, plumbing)
  • Electrical systems & distribution
  • Fire protection & life safety
  • Interior finishes & common areas
  • Site improvements, grading & parking
  • ACA/barrier-free accessibility observations

Deliverables

  • Written Facility Condition Assessment report
  • Component inventory classified to UNIFORMAT II
  • Condition ratings for assessed systems and components
  • Photographic documentation of observed conditions
  • Prioritized deficiency and renewal list
  • Opinions of probable cost with expected timing
  • Capital expenditure table over the agreed planning horizon
  • Executive summary for facilities and finance stakeholders

Facility Condition Assessment Process

Our streamlined approach ensures thorough assessment with minimal disruption.

Scope Review

We confirm facilities in scope, systems to be assessed, asset detail level, planning horizon, and reporting format before pricing.

Document & Records Review

Available drawings, asset lists, maintenance records, and prior studies are reviewed to inform the assessment.

Site Assessment

On-site evaluation of accessible systems and assets, with photographic documentation and condition ratings.

Reporting

Findings, renewal priorities, and cost opinions are compiled into the agreed format. The written proposal confirms the planning horizon, deliverables and project schedule.

PCA sample report excerpt (illustrative of reporting format)

PCA sample report excerpt (illustrative of reporting format). This is not a completed FCA report or asset-register export. FCA scope and deliverables are defined in the written proposal.

PCA sample report excerpt (illustrative of reporting format) All Sample Reports

Standards & References

  • ASTM E2018-24 — Standard Guide for Property Condition Assessments
  • ASTM E1557-09 — UNIFORMAT II Classification for Building Elements
  • Alberta Building Code (current edition)
  • APEGA Engineering Practice Standards

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a Facility Condition Assessment?

A Facility Condition Assessment (FCA) is a condition review of a facility's building systems and assets, carried out to support facilities management, renewal prioritization, and multi-year capital budgeting. It documents condition, deficiencies, and expected renewal work with opinions of probable cost and timing.

How is an FCA different from a PCA or BCA?

The methodology we use is the same — ASTM E2018-24 — and the terms overlap heavily in practice. The difference is usually one of audience and emphasis: a PCA is most often commissioned for a transaction or financing decision, while an FCA is commissioned by owners and facilities teams to plan renewal spending on facilities they already operate. We do not treat the labels as universally equivalent; the written scope agreed before the engagement determines the deliverable.

Do you calculate a Facility Condition Index (FCI)?

FCI is not part of our standard deliverable. Our reports provide condition ratings, prioritized renewal needs, and opinions of probable cost. If an FCI or another specific index is required by your organization, raise it during the scope review and we will confirm in writing whether it can be included before you commit.

Can an FCA cover more than one facility?

Yes. Multiple facilities can be included in a single engagement. Each facility is assessed and priced on its own details, and the scope, schedule, and fees for each are set out in the written proposal.

How much does an FCA cost in Alberta?

Fees depend on facility size, age, complexity, number of systems and assets in scope, planning horizon, and travel distance. FCA enquiries are quoted after a short scope review rather than from a fixed price list. Request a quote and we respond with a written fee proposal, typically within one business day (Mountain Time).

Which Alberta communities do you serve?

We serve 43 communities across Alberta, including Edmonton Metro, Calgary Metro, Red Deer, and central, north, east, and west Alberta. Travel is accounted for in the written fee proposal.

Explore More

Services

Property Types

Service Areas

Need a Facility Condition Assessment?

For a useful FCA quote, provide facility count and locations, approximate total area, available asset lists, desired planning horizon and preferred output format.

3 Certifications

Book Inspection

43 Service Areas

Typical response: under 4 hours

587-333-5530 Contact Us